The Phenomenon of Species Transformation of Sculpture in the Contemporary Art Criticism Discourse

Issue: 
Pages: 
94-103
Abstract: 

Background. The ambivalent artistic experience of the last decades is increasingly characterized by the formula of blurring the borders. This process was also reflected in the field of sculpture as a form of art. The changes also concern fundamental approaches to the creation of sculpture and its study, which raises a number of problems of theoretical and practical nature. Objectives. In view of this, the purpose of the article is to analyze coverage of the phenomenon of transformation of sculpture as a form of art in the 20th and early 21st centuries in domestic and foreign literary sources; outline the range of tasks that confront contemporary theory and practice of sculpture. Methods. Historical-chronological, analytical, synthetic-interpretative and comparative methods of analysis were used to solve these tasks. Results. The analysis of scientific sources on this topic gives grounds to state that it should be considered as a component of the general process of change of cultural and artistic paradigms (modernism and postmodernism, first of all), which caused cardinal transformations in all traditional forms of art and changed the understanding of the “modernity” category. But one should consider that tectonic shifts in the sphere of art were most reflected in the realm of sculpture. On the basis of a comparative analysis of Ukrainian and foreign art studies, we can note the unity of researchers' views on the main milestones and factors in the evolution of sculpture as a form of art and a radical transformation of sculptural aesthetics: scientific and technological revolution, Marcel Duchamp's invention of the ready-made and application of new materials and techniques, de-aesthetization of artistic activity, change of creative psychology of contemporary artists, their reorientation from an autonomous sculptural object to its interaction with the environment and the viewer. All scholars agree that artistic movements such as minimalism and conceptualism had the greatest influence on the contemporary understanding of art, sculpture in particular. They shifted the emphasis from the morphology of works of art to their function, from the emotionally-shaped comprehension of the world to a rational-logical model, according to which contemporary art is primarily perceived as an intellectual form of activity. The critical role of art criticism in the process of blurring the species and genre boundaries of the notion of sculpture, and as a consequence the professional and moral responsibility of contemporary art criticism for the objective research and interpretation of current artistic processes and phenomena should be also stated. Conclusions. The prospects for further exploration in this area are seen in the elaboration of the terminological aspect of the issue and the development of universal criteria for the classification of new types of sculpture and the latest three-dimensional artistic practices.

UDC: 
73:005.745] (477)
Language of publication: 
Українська
References: 

1. Andreeva, Ye. Yu. (2007). Postmodernizm: Iskusstvo vtoroy poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka. [Postmodernism: Art of the Second Half of the 20th and Early 21st century]. Azbuka-klassika, 488.
2. Benjamin, W. (2010). Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. [The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction]. Chastnyy korrespondent. http://www.chaskor.ru/article/proizvedenie_iskusstva_v_epohu_ego_tehnich...
3. Vysheslavsky, G., Sydor-Hibelynda, O. (2010). Terminologhija suchasnogho mystectva. Oznachennja, neologhizmy, zharghonizmy suchasnogho vizualjnogho mystectva Ukrajiny. [Contemporary Art Terminology: Definitions, Neologisms, Jargonisms in Ukrainian Contemporary Visual Art]. Paris–Kyiv, 416.
4.    Gavrilov, V. A. (2004). Plasticheskie novatsii v skulpture XX veka. [Plastic Innovations in the Sculpture of the 20th Century]. [PhD Dissertation Abstract, St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions]. http://cheloveknauka.com/v/122598/a?#?page=14
5. Gholubecj, O. M. (2012). Mystectvo XX stolittja: ukrajinsjkyj shljakh. [Twentieth Century Art: The Ukrainian Way]. Kolir PRO, 200.
 6. Kotlomanov, A. O. (2014). Pablik-art: stranitsyi istorii. Britanskie parki skulpturyi vtoroy polovinyi XX veka. [Public Art: Pages of History. British Sculpture Parks of the Second Half of the 20th Century]. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University, 15(1), 97–106. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/pablik-art-stranitsy-istorii-britanski...
7. Kotlomanov, A. O. (2015). Pablik-art: stranitsyi istorii. Iskusstvo v kontekste prirodyi i priroda v kontekste iskusstva. [Public Art: Pages of History. Art in the Context of Nature and Nature in the Context of Art]. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University, 15(2), 75–86. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/pablik-art-stranitsy-istorii-iskusstvo...
8. Kotlomanov, A. O. (2013). Pablik-art: stranitsy istorii. Poiski arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennogo sinteza v britanskom iskusstve vtoroy poloviny XX v. [Public Art: Pages of History. The Search for Architectural and Artistic Synthesis in British Art of the Second Half of the 20th century.]. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University, 15(4). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pablik-art-stranitsy-istorii-poiski-ar...
9. Kotlomanov, A. O. (2015). Pablik-art: stranitsy istorii. Torzhestvo kontseptualizma. Biennale, konkursy, art-proekty. [Public Art: Pages of History. The Triumph of Conceptualism. Biennale, Contests, Art Projects]. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University, 15(3). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pablik-art-stranitsy-istorii-torzhestv...
10. Kosuth, J. (1969). Iskusstvo posle filosofii. [Art After Philosophy]. http://vcsi.ru/files/art_after_philosophy.pdf
11. Lysenko, L. O., Protas, M. O. (2007). Skuljptura. [Sculpture]. History of Ukrainian Art: In 5 Vols. NAN Ukrajiny. IMFE im. M. T. Ryljsjkogho, 802–827.
12. Lysenko, L. (2010). Skuljpturni ideji KhKh stolittja – dyskurs suchasnosti. [The Sculptural Ideas of the 20th Century – the Discourse of the Present]. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, 155–159.
13. Miskaryan, K. (2007). Rasshirenie granits. [Expanding borders]. Art, 5, 42–49.
14. Odrekhivsjkyj, V. V. (2018). Ukrajinsjka skuljptura kincja XX – pochatku XXI stolittja: transformaciji monumentaljnogho formotvorennja. [Ukrainian Sculpture of the Late 20th and Early 21st Century: Transformations of Monumental Formation]. [PhD Dissertation, National Academy of Fine Arts and Architecture].
15. Podolskaya, K. S. (2017). Transformatsiya skulptury kak vida iskusstva vo vtoroy polovine XX – nachale XX veka. [Transformation of Sculpture as a Form of Art in the Second Half of the 20th and Early 21st Century]. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice. http://scjournal.ru/articles/issn_1997-292X_2017_12-2_39.pdf
16. Protas, M. O. (2006). Ukrajinsjka skuljptura XX stolittja. [Ukrainian Sculpture of the 20th century]. Intertekhnologhija, 278.
17. Prudenko, Ja. (2014). Klasychni vydy mystectva v epokhu novitnikh tekhnologhij. Skuljptura. [Classic Art in the Age of the Latest Technology. Sculpture]. Art Ukraine. http://artukraine.com.ua/a/klasichni-vidi-mistectva-v-epokhu-novitnikh-t....
18. Razdyakonova, Ye. V. (2011). Vzaimosvyaz yazyka sovremennogo iskusstva i mifologicheskogo myshleniya. [The Relationship of the Language of Modern Art and Mythological Thinking]. The Successes of Modern Science.  https://www.natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=28619
19. Read, H. (2018). Kratkaya istoriya sovremennoy skulptury. [Modern Sculpture: A Concise History]. Iskusstvo – XXI vek, 240. (Original work published 1964)
20. Skljarenko, Gh. (2002). Dejaki ponjattja i terminy v ukrajinsjkomu mystectvi XX stolittja. [Some Concepts and Terms in 20th-Century Ukrainian Art]. Problems of Ukrainian terminological vocabulary in art and ethnology. Scientific collection of the memory of Mykola Trokhimenko, VI, 73–81.
21. Smirnaya, L., Khamatov, V., Puchkov, A. (2016). Modernoe, sovremennoe i noveyshee iskusstvo: Popytka osmysleniya ponyatiy. [Modern, Contemporary, and Contemporary Art: An Attempt to Understand Concepts]. Contemporary Art, 12, 158–168.
22. Causey, A. (1998). Sculpture Since 1945. Oxford University Press, 304.
23.    The Art Story. Installation Art. In The Art Story.org. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from https://www.theartstory.org/movement/installation-art/
24. Encyclopedia Britannica. Installation & Performance Art. In Encyclopedia Britannica.com. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from  https://www.britannica.com/browse/Installation-Art
25.    Krauss, R. (1977). Passages in Modern Sculpture. The Viking Press, 310.
26.    Krauss, R. (2012). Sculpture in the Expanded Field. Modern Sculpture Reader. Henry Moore Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum, 333–342. (Original work published 1978)
27.    Moszynska, A. (2013). Sculpture now. Thames & Hudson Ltd, 232.
28.    Potts, A. (2012). Introduction: The Idea of Modern Sculpture. Modern Sculpture Reader. Henry Moore Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum. (Original work published 2007)